| From: | Jerry Sievers <jerry(at)jerrysievers(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Hosting Service Recommendations |
| Date: | 2005-04-25 14:13:05 |
| Message-ID: | m3vf6baqry.fsf@prod01.jerrysievers.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Chris Kratz <chris(dot)kratz(at)vistashare(dot)com> writes:
> It seems the consensus on this list is that when running postgres,
> Opterons outperform Xeons by a significant margin not to mention the
> CS storms postgres seems to cause on Xeons. We are looking for a
> hosting service for a postgresql based application. Unfortunately,
> it seems most services standardize on Dell and by extension Xeon
> hardware. Do anyone have recommendations for hosting services that
> would be able to provide Opteron based hardware and have decent
> service? Or are we stuck with Xeons? -- Chris Kratz
You might consider a co-located server. You supply the hardware of
your choosing and the ISP puts it in their datacenter.
Less popular than dedicated server (owned by the ISP) but a good
choice if you have special hardware needs.
Not all ISPs do colo so, better check around.
HTH
--
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Jerry Sievers 305 854-3001 (home) WWW ECommerce Consultant
305 321-1144 (mobile http://www.JerrySievers.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Michael Fuhr | 2005-04-25 14:32:55 | Re: Immutable attributes? |
| Previous Message | Akbar | 2005-04-25 14:05:43 | Re: Installation problem with the version 8.0.2 |