From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Can postgresql be run in memory (like a memory resi |
Date: | 2003-02-25 20:11:49 |
Message-ID: | m3u1esunlm.fsf@chvatal.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Quoth rmalghan(at)btspartners(dot)com ("Malghan, Ravi"):
> What I am trying to do is, I have multiple databases some of which
> are frequently accessed. So I am trying to see if the one's which
> are frequently accessed can be run as memory resident and others run
> normally. I am thinking this might improve response times.
In the ancient past, people would "set the sticky bit" on executable
programs to force them to stay in memory; that idea has become
obsolete what with larger memory sizes and more sophisticated memory
management schemes in Unix variants. I think you're essentially
trying to express the same idea here...
The tables/databases that are frequently accessed should already be
mostly in memory as a result of the way your OS caches data.
It's not likely that there's anything that you can do "inside
PostgreSQL" that would be helpful in this regard.
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@acm.org")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/finances.html
"Though the Chinese should adore APL, it's FORTRAN they put their
money on." -- Alan Perlis
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dennis Gearon | 2003-02-25 20:17:27 | triggers |
Previous Message | Christopher Browne | 2003-02-25 20:06:16 | Re: Can postgresql be run in memory (like a memory resident program) |