From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication on the backend |
Date: | 2005-12-09 13:47:41 |
Message-ID: | m3u0di9ybm.fsf@mobile.int.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
> Are you sure that no way to implement a generic aproach on the
> backend? What does specification say?
What specification are you talking about?
> Does Oracle 10g have a core implementation of replication (cluster)?
Since replication is sold as a separate product from Oracle 10g,
obviously not.
We *know* (particularly those of us that have had involvement in
actually implementing replication systems used in production
environments) that "user space" implementations of replication can
function satisfactorily. We've implemented it.
You might be able to convince us that implementing replication inside
the backend is preferable, but you'll have to have exceedingly strong
evidence in order to overcome the already known factor that doing it
outside the backend works quite well.
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="gmail.com" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/slony.html
"Now, suddenly, I _am_ the expanding Russian Frontier" -- Commander
Ivanova
"But with very nice borders..." -- Dr Franklin
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2005-12-09 14:17:55 | Re: Reducing contention for the LockMgrLock |
Previous Message | Ricardo Vaz - TCESP | 2005-12-09 13:35:25 | Log of CREATE USER statement |