| From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ioannis <Ioannis(at)dante(dot)org(dot)uk> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: postgre performance question |
| Date: | 2002-03-04 13:46:09 |
| Message-ID: | m3sn7gmony.fsf@varsoon.denali.to |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Ioannis <Ioannis(at)dante(dot)org(dot)uk> writes:
> Hello,
>
> I am using a PostgreSQL database and I recently ran to some
> problems.
> I have a table of around two hunded thousand entries (each entry is
> 78 bytes) and a simple (selct * from table) query takes a lot of
> time to
> complete). Moreover a (select * from table where column = (select
> oid from another_table)) takes several tens of minutes. An index is
> already used for `column'.
> The `another_table' has something like 200 entries, while column
> takes its values from the OIDs of `another_table'.
Sounds as if you're not running VACUUM.
-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Ioannis Kappas | 2002-03-04 13:56:15 | Re: postgre performance question |
| Previous Message | Holger Marzen | 2002-03-04 13:26:50 | Re: copying database? |