Re: Text format protocol representation

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Text format protocol representation
Date: 2003-05-19 22:26:20
Message-ID: m3smra60ab.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu> writes:

> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>
> > Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> writes:
> > > What's the rationale for not including the trailing zero byte in the
> > > protocol representation of the text format?
> >
> > History, mostly --- we have not done it in the past.
>
> nuls in strings aren't allowed, eh? Is there any possibility that nuls in
> strings will be supported at some time in the future?

What's wrong with using "bytea" for binary data?

-Doug

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tony Reina 2003-05-19 23:20:05 Anyone have a Windows DLL of libpq?
Previous Message Jim C. Nasby 2003-05-19 21:37:08 Re: ERROR: Memory exhausted in AllocSetAlloc(188)