From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Rewriting pg_upgrade |
Date: | 2003-09-29 23:35:18 |
Message-ID: | m3smmfkw21.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)libertyrms(dot)info> writes:
> pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us (Bruce Momjian) writes:
> > Jim C. Nasby wrote:
> >> FWIW, FreeBSD just removed it (in the 5.x versions). Of course you can
> >> still easily install it from ports.
> >
> > Interesting. Why would they remove it?
>
> Because it's a REALLY BIG ball of mud to include as a core dependancy?
/agree
Also, it's quite probable that people installing/upgrading PG would
have anything from 5.003 onward. Knowing what programming constructs
you can use and still be compatible with older versions requires quite
a bit of scholarship.
I know that if I were upgrading PG on, say, a Red Hat 6.2 box and was
forced to upgrade Perl to 5.8.1 as a dependency I'd be swearing pretty
hard...
-Doug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-09-29 23:54:32 | Re: Is there any way to force analyze to run on a whole table? |
Previous Message | Lamar Owen | 2003-09-29 23:26:40 | Re: Where is libpq++ on redhat 9? |