From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: constraints and performance |
Date: | 2004-02-11 14:06:46 |
Message-ID: | m3smhh7ls9.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
A long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, jkanter(at)virginia(dot)edu (Jodi Kanter) wrote:
> Do constraints effect performance significantly?
They would be expected to provide a significant enhancement to
performance over:
a) Firing triggers,
b) Firing rules, and
c) Forcing the application to validate the data, and then adding
in "data validation" reports to report on the cases where a buggy
application violated the constraints.
So yes, they should be considerably faster than any of their
alternatives.
--
wm(X,Y):-write(X),write('@'),write(Y). wm('cbbrowne','ntlug.org').
http://cbbrowne.com/info/lsf.html
"The only constructive theory connecting neuroscience and psychology
will arise from the study of software."
-- Alan Perlis
[To the endless aggravation of both disciplines. Ed.]
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Greg Mennie | 2004-02-11 14:25:53 | Re: hanging for 30sec when checkpointing |
Previous Message | Jodi Kanter | 2004-02-11 13:21:01 | constraints and performance |