From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Slony uninstall info/warning |
Date: | 2005-02-15 19:00:20 |
Message-ID: | m3sm3xodh7.fsf@knuth.knuth.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, johnsw(at)wardbrook(dot)com (John Sidney-Woollett) transmitted:
> MAKE SURE YOU STOP YOUR APPLICATION RUNNING AGAINST YOUR MASTER
> DATABASE WHEN REMOVING THE WHOLE SLONY CLUSTER, or at least re-cycle
> all your open connections after the event!
>
> The connections appear to "remember" or refer to objects which are
> removed by the uninstall node script. And you get lots of errors as a
> result (and possible data loss??)...
As has been noted by others, this is an artifact of the JDBC driver
holding onto a stored query plan. And it's somewhat worth noting that
this is not unique to Slony-I...
I have added warnings to relevant documentation in the Slony-I CVS
tree. This may also be worthy of a FAQ note for PostgreSQL itself,
and is almost certainly worthy of note in the JDBC documentation...
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "acm.org")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/slony.html
"We should start referring to processes which run in the background by
their correct technical name:... paenguins." -- Kevin M Bealer
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dan Sugalski | 2005-02-15 19:32:56 | CURSORs and selects with parameters |
Previous Message | Ruben Oliveira | 2005-02-15 17:00:51 | Re: problem with dots in order by |