From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Mike Castle <dalgoda(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Re: Re: PostgreSQL over NFS? |
Date: | 2001-02-10 01:57:13 |
Message-ID: | m3r917z4ee.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Mike Castle <dalgoda(at)ix(dot)netcom(dot)com> writes:
> Another point of concern is state of the system when a backup is taken.
> Other threads pointed out the concern about backing up files during the
> middle of transactions and the like. Better if able to ask the LVM layer
> (or whatever) to take a snapshot, and then back THAT up. Does netapp offer
> such facilities? (I would imagine so, but not positive). If not, one may
> still have to do a pg_dump just to maintain stable backups.
I don't think that LVM (or snapshots in general, which NetApps do
indeed offer) will help without a way to tell PG to quiesce itself and
flush all caches to disk. A random snapshot of a PG database will
almost certainly not be consistent.
I don't think PG has anything like Oracle's "hot backup" mode, except
for pg_dump itself.
-Doug
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-02-10 02:37:13 | Re: Postmaster uses Large Amounts of Swap |
Previous Message | Mike Castle | 2001-02-10 01:43:48 | Re: Re: Re: PostgreSQL over NFS? |