Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL?

From: Ronald Cole <ronald(at)forte-intl(dot)com>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Why PostgreSQL is not that popular as MySQL?
Date: 2000-11-30 01:18:01
Message-ID: m3pujefeba.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Raymond Chui <raymond(dot)chui(at)noaa(dot)gov> writes:
> I am just start look at PostgreSQL for our Redhat Linux.
> I am wonder why most of people choose MySQL in Linux
> world rather than PostgreSQL? PostgreSQL has 15 years
> history (I never know that before) which is much longer
> than MySQL. Also PostgreSQL supports a lot of things
> which MySQL has not support yet.

Postgres, yes. PostgreSQL, no. PostgreSQL was a new project with
Postgres95 as a starting point. Postgres95 was an attempt to put an
SQL front-end on Postgres. AFAIK, most all of the Postgres code was
jettisoned early on for performance reasons. That makes PostgreSQL
roughly five years old, code-wise.

I still have a Postgres95 tree in CVS before the PostgreSQL fork to
prove it, too! ;)

--
Forte International, P.O. Box 1412, Ridgecrest, CA 93556-1412
Ronald Cole <ronald(at)forte-intl(dot)com> Phone: (760) 499-9142
President, CEO Fax: (760) 499-9152
My GPG fingerprint: C3AF 4BE9 BEA6 F1C2 B084 4A88 8851 E6C8 69E3 B00B

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Brian Aker 2000-11-30 01:19:32 Date functions
Previous Message Tom Lane 2000-11-30 00:25:17 Re: [GENERAL] Warning: Don't delete those /tmp/.PGSQL.* files