Re: some databases have not been vacuumed ...

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: some databases have not been vacuumed ...
Date: 2005-08-02 14:28:52
Message-ID: m3pssw76qj.fsf@knuth.cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-admin

In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com ("Joshua D. Drake") transmitted:
> FM wrote:
>> Hello after a vacuum full analyse I received this :
>> WARNING: some databases have not been vacuumed in 1805294030 transactions
>> HINT: Better vacuum them within 342189617 transactions, or you may
>> have a wraparound failure.
>> I read that it's because i do not vacuum DB very often.
>> Now I vacuum every night but the warning remains.
>> How can I get rid of this ?
>
> Run a vacuum full on all the database.

That seems overkill.

The problem is likely that the "old tuples" are in some database not
being vacuumed. template1 is a likely candidate; do a plain VACUUM on
that and the message may go away.

It can be *possible* for the issue to be with template0, if it had at
some point been open for modification. If that is the case, it is a
good idea to:
- Unlock template0 (via table pg_database)
- Run VACUUM FREEZE on template0
- Relock it
--
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "gmail.com")
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/slony.html
"You think you know when you can learn, are more sure when you can
write, even more when you can teach, but certain when you can
program." -- Alan Perlis

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-admin by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2005-08-02 17:08:09 Re: some databases have not been vacuumed ...
Previous Message Tom Lane 2005-08-02 00:35:27 Re: pg_dump failure in tar format.