From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Online backup vs Continuous backup |
Date: | 2005-12-28 04:33:07 |
Message-ID: | m3psnhq1rw.fsf@mobile.int.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> I suggest the following patch to rename our capability "Continuous
>> Backup".
>
> This doesn't seem like an improvement. "Online backup" is the standard
> terminology AFAIK.
There's something ambiguous about it, in view that there are two
useful points in time for a backup to be "as of," namely:
a) The start time (which is what pg_dump does), and
b) The end time (which I believe is not uncommon with other systems).
PITR is obviously more like b)...
--
wm(X,Y):-write(X),write('@'),write(Y). wm('cbbrowne','gmail.com').
http://linuxfinances.info/info/slony.html
Keeping instructions and operands in different memories saves .20
(.09) microseconds.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-12-28 05:20:11 | Re: sending mail from Postgres |
Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2005-12-28 04:30:15 | Re: sending mail from Postgres |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-12-28 05:20:11 | Re: sending mail from Postgres |
Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2005-12-28 04:30:15 | Re: sending mail from Postgres |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2005-12-28 05:20:11 | Re: sending mail from Postgres |
Previous Message | Jeremy Drake | 2005-12-28 04:30:15 | Re: sending mail from Postgres |