| From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Tom Lane" <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Suggestion for optimization |
| Date: | 2002-04-05 19:51:32 |
| Message-ID: | m3ofgxzzy3.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"Dann Corbit" <DCorbit(at)connx(dot)com> writes:
> If this is true (even after a commit) then MVCC is a very bad thing. No
> transactions occur, and two people ask the same question yet get
> different answers. Doesn't that scare anyone? That would mean (among
> other things) that Postgresql cannot be used for a data warehouse.
Have you read the doc chapter about MVCC? Sounds like you don't
quite understand how it works yet.
-Doug
--
Doug McNaught Wireboard Industries http://www.wireboard.com/
Custom software development, systems and network consulting.
Java PostgreSQL Enhydra Python Zope Perl Apache Linux BSD...
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2002-04-05 19:51:41 | Re: Suggestion for optimization |
| Previous Message | Dann Corbit | 2002-04-05 19:50:07 | Re: Suggestion for optimization |