Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types

From: James Cloos <cloos(at)jhcloos(dot)com>
To: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Floating-point timestamps versus Range Types
Date: 2010-10-25 17:54:33
Message-ID: m3ocaiuphq.fsf@jhcloos.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

>>>>> "JD" == Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:

JD> 2. Fix the input/output functions in a special mode for dump/reload,
JD> to make them true inverses.

That can be done by supporting the %A printf(3)/scanf(3) format.

-JimC
--
James Cloos <cloos(at)jhcloos(dot)com> OpenPGP: 1024D/ED7DAEA6

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Jeff Davis 2010-10-25 18:01:56 Re: Range Types, discrete and/or continuous
Previous Message Greg Stark 2010-10-25 17:42:35 Re: ask for review of MERGE