Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> writes:
>
> > An AFTER trigger to do this should be pretty easy.
>
> It had better be a BEFORE trigger; AFTER is too late to affect the row
> that will be stored.
Ack, you're right--I was thinking in terms of updating a field in a
different table (don't ask me why). Thanks for the correction.
-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863