| From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org, Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> |
| Subject: | Re: Backing up databases with large objects DOESN'T WORK? |
| Date: | 2002-02-08 00:27:04 |
| Message-ID: | m3lme44y3r.fsf@varsoon.denali.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> writes:
> > Do I also need an RI constraint? That's relatively easy to do,
> > especially if I'm doing the horrible sed thing.
>
> I don't think an RI constraint would help a lot, since the LO operations
> aren't going to check it (eg, lo_unlink won't fire an error). In
> general we don't support triggers placed on system catalogs...
OK. I will tangle with the schema definition tomorrow and see if I
can get it to work.
Thanks again...
-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | pilsl | 2002-02-08 00:33:05 | libnss-psql : troubles with groups |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-08 00:08:17 | Re: Backing up databases with large objects DOESN'T WORK? |