Re: what we need to use postgresql in the enterprise

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: what we need to use postgresql in the enterprise
Date: 2004-01-12 12:57:26
Message-ID: m3k73xjpe1.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Clinging to sanity, xzilla(at)users(dot)sourceforge(dot)net (Robert Treat) mumbled into her beard:
> I think your pretty much on target with the below. It is possible to
> work around these issues on some level, but I can see how that might
> get unwieldly in a hurry. While I won't tell you to "go code it if
> you need it", I might ask that you consider what your paying in
> Oracle licenses and think about spending that money to hire someone
> to develop those features in PostgreSQL, I'm thinking you'd save
> money in the long run.

I was under the impression that someone was working on nested
transactions, with a view of them maybe becoming a 7.5 feature.

It might thereby be worthwhile to figure out who that "someone" is,
which is probably googleable, and maybe offer them something of a
"bounty," whereby if the feature makes it in, there might be some
money in it...
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@" "acm.org")
http://cbbrowne.com/info/spreadsheets.html
This login session: only $23.95!

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Chris Travers 2004-01-12 13:22:27 Re: History-based (or logged) database.
Previous Message Sai Hertz And Control Systems 2004-01-12 12:51:22 Re: insertion with trigger failed unexpectedly