| From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB? |
| Date: | 2005-08-11 12:11:09 |
| Message-ID: | m3k6issmg2.fsf@mobile.int.cbbrowne.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> I saw their announment today and they said they have Oracle compatiblility.
>
> What exactly does this mean? They don't go into any details. Did
> they implement a Oracle compatible proc language or something?
I believe you are correct.
It's probably safer to say "they have implemented a more nearly Oracle
compatible procedural language."
You can get /some/ feel for it by looking at the recent release
notes... <http://www.enterprisedb.com/releasenotes.do>
- They have a "DUAL" table (a table guaranteed to have 1 row)
- You don't need the full function argument "signature" in order
to drop a function; just name the function
- They seem to have added in a SYS user
You can download version 8.0.3.12, which presumably includes some
amount of documentation...
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://cbbrowne.com/info/
If we were meant to fly, we wouldn't keep losing our luggage.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Boes | 2005-08-11 12:45:33 | Re: World-wide Stop Order on PERL,Python,Java::->> Use |
| Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-08-11 11:40:49 | Re: regarding isolation between threads |