From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: What's up with EnterpriseDB? |
Date: | 2005-08-11 12:11:09 |
Message-ID: | m3k6issmg2.fsf@mobile.int.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
> I saw their announment today and they said they have Oracle compatiblility.
>
> What exactly does this mean? They don't go into any details. Did
> they implement a Oracle compatible proc language or something?
I believe you are correct.
It's probably safer to say "they have implemented a more nearly Oracle
compatible procedural language."
You can get /some/ feel for it by looking at the recent release
notes... <http://www.enterprisedb.com/releasenotes.do>
- They have a "DUAL" table (a table guaranteed to have 1 row)
- You don't need the full function argument "signature" in order
to drop a function; just name the function
- They seem to have added in a SYS user
You can download version 8.0.3.12, which presumably includes some
amount of documentation...
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://cbbrowne.com/info/
If we were meant to fly, we wouldn't keep losing our luggage.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Jeff Boes | 2005-08-11 12:45:33 | Re: World-wide Stop Order on PERL,Python,Java::->> Use |
Previous Message | Richard Huxton | 2005-08-11 11:40:49 | Re: regarding isolation between threads |