Re: Optimizer Question/Suggestion - numbers after

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Optimizer Question/Suggestion - numbers after
Date: 2002-11-02 14:33:29
Message-ID: m3iszg59dy.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Philip Warner <pjw(at)rhyme(dot)com(dot)au> writes:

> At 07:39 PM 2/11/2002 +1100, Philip Warner wrote:

> The latter time is actually quote good; when the machine is more
> heavily loaded it goes up to 10000ms.
>
> We currently vacuum/analyze daily, and analyze hourly.

Why not vacuum hourly (regular non-blocking vacuum, not FULL)?

-Doug

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2002-11-02 14:36:42 Re: Optimizer Question/Suggestion
Previous Message Tom Lane 2002-11-02 14:26:56 Re: "Cache lookup failed for relation 16905" ??