From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-admin(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Replication |
Date: | 2003-08-30 23:47:22 |
Message-ID: | m3isoeemid.fsf@chvatal.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin |
Martha Stewart called it a Good Thing whenianh(at)hubspan(dot)com ("Ian Huynh")wrote:
> Seems that there are a number of simultaneous project in trying to implement replication
> for postgres.
>
> Is anyone out there using this feature currently? If so , which package & OS environment.
>
> the latest news was eRServer v1.0. Is this the same as the v1.2 that Postgres INC announced
> early this year ?
>
> Is there a master-master capability or only master-multi-slave ?
The version of eRServer recently released as free software is not the
latest "production" release, but it is a direct predecessor.
Its operational model is that of "master/possible multiple slaves,"
NOT multimaster.
Multimaster involves some thorny issues surrounding synchronization,
as it is possible for one master to receive a set of changes
concurrently with another master receiving _incompatible_ changes.
PalmOS users see this if they change a particular record on both
desktop and palmtop; the next time they sync, the conflicting record
normally gets duplicated and the user gets to decide how to fix it.
Doing that in a big production database context may not be
possible/acceptable. You only should do multimaster if you REALLY
know what you're doing.
--
select 'aa454' || '@' || 'freenet.carleton.ca';
http://www.ntlug.org/~cbbrowne/sap.html
Do you know where your towel is?
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2003-08-30 23:55:24 | Re: Replication |
Previous Message | Ian Huynh | 2003-08-30 22:39:57 | Replication |