Re:

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
To: Denis Gasparin <denis(at)edinet(dot)it>
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re:
Date: 2001-08-23 17:03:29
Message-ID: m3heuyemji.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Denis Gasparin <denis(at)edinet(dot)it> writes:

> Hi to all!
> I have created a table using the CREATE TABLE new_table
> (col1,col2,col3) AS SELECT col1,col2,col3 FROM org_table.
>
> I create an index on this table using the statement:
> CREATE UNIQUE INDEX table_idx ON new_table (col1).
> Then i do a select as this:
> SELECT * FROM new_table WHERE col1 = 'value'.
>
> The problem is that when i do an explain this is the query plan:
>
> Seq Scan on new_table (cost=0.00..1116.38 rows=500 width=44)>
>
> Can anyone explain me why it doesn't use the index I have created?

How populated is the table? If it's small, or if you haven't done
VACUUM ANALYZE, the statistics may end up preferring a sequential
scan.

-Doug
--
Free Dmitry Sklyarov!
http://www.freesklyarov.org/

We will return to our regularly scheduled signature shortly.

In response to

  • at 2001-08-23 16:05:35 from Denis Gasparin

Responses

  • Re: at 2001-08-24 06:54:23 from Denis Gasparin
  • Re: at 2001-08-24 09:54:06 from Denis Gasparin

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message tomasz konefal 2001-08-23 17:05:51 resin-cmp, apache1.3.20, ultradev4, and postgresql7.0 problems
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2001-08-23 16:50:51 Re: Looking for JDBC Driver