| From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Name that project contest! |
| Date: | 2005-04-09 21:50:57 |
| Message-ID: | m3hdif7h6m.fsf@knuth.cbbrowne.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
mitch(dot)pirtle(at)gmail(dot)com (Mitch Pirtle) wrote:
> I know this will cause some groans, but if the target market is
> business, and more specifically the enterprise, why not just call it
> 'PostgreSQL Enterprise Edition'?
>
> Perhaps not sexy, or humorous, but it is clear and consise exactly as
> to what the purpose is, while still being tied to the PostgreSQL name.
Actually, no, it's not "consise" as to purpose; it doesn't actually
imply anything about what the purpose is.
I'd generally expect "Enterprise Edition" to indicate the addition of
transaction-oriented functionality. 2PC, automagic JavaBeans, that
sort of thing.
Plausible names might include:
- PostgreStar
- CubeSQL
- PostCube
- PostStar
--
select 'cbbrowne' || '@' || 'gmail.com';
http://linuxdatabases.info/info/lisp.html
"The American Republic will endure until the day Congress discovers
that it can bribe the public with the public's money"
-- Alexis de Toucqueville
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2005-04-10 00:13:17 | Re: Name that project contest! |
| Previous Message | Mitch Pirtle | 2005-04-09 17:20:44 | Re: Name that project contest! |