From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Robert Myers <ccrider(at)whiterose(dot)net> |
Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: ByteA for binary data? |
Date: | 2002-02-25 03:00:12 |
Message-ID: | m3g03q1d1f.fsf@varsoon.denali.to |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Robert Myers <ccrider(at)whiterose(dot)net> writes:
> I've read the available documentation on LO and bytea, and both seem to
> have troubles, is this something that will be fixed in a future
> release? I'm currently running 7.2.
I've been using LOs with great success since 7.1--there are no current
problems with it, though the API is a little convoluted. I prefer
them to bytea fields becauser you're not forced to load the whole
thing into memory either on the server or client side (I work with
multi-megabyte data files). I use Java on the client.
Have you read the bytea docs on proper quoting? Is your PHP install
up to date? Older versions would truncate queries at 8k I think...
-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thomas T. Thai | 2002-02-25 03:02:33 | Re: ByteA for binary data? |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2002-02-25 02:47:36 | Re: [HACKERS] Nice Oracle tuning article |