| From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gurupartap Davis" <partap(at)yahoo(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Francisco Reyes" <lists(at)natserv(dot)com>, "pgsql General List" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: pgsql and large tables |
| Date: | 2001-11-16 01:39:04 |
| Message-ID: | m3d72jbikn.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Gurupartap Davis" <partap(at)yahoo(dot)com> writes:
> Sheesh...I think I see what you're saying about normalization. I've never
> had a formal db class, but it looks like you're talking about removing all
> the redundancy from the database...and there's a lot in this one(!)
[...]
> Dang...I don't know if my employer will let me make a change this radical,
> though. We would have to redo every single query in about 50 scripts.
You might be able to define views and rules in such a way that old
queries still work, or work with minor changes.
-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Barry Lind | 2001-11-16 01:51:39 | bug or change in functionality in 7.2? |
| Previous Message | Gurupartap Davis | 2001-11-16 01:01:36 | Re: pgsql and large tables |