Re: Problem with null timestamp fields

From: Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com>
To: "Thomas T(dot) Veldhouse" <veldy(at)veldy(dot)net>
Cc: "GH" <grasshacker(at)over-yonder(dot)net>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Problem with null timestamp fields
Date: 2001-06-28 12:19:50
Message-ID: m3bsn8hk49.fsf@belphigor.mcnaught.org
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

"Thomas T. Veldhouse" <veldy(at)veldy(dot)net> writes:

> Yes, that was it. It should have been more obvious had I looked closer. A
> second pair of eyes are always helpful. Still, I am a bit amazed that the
> database allows this (trailing or leading spaces in the column names).

If you use double quotes around names, it means "this is exactly what
I want, don't do anything to it." If you don't like this, don't use
double quotes (there's no real reason to except possibly for
compatibility reasons).

-Doug
--
The rain man gave me two cures; he said jump right in,
The first was Texas medicine--the second was just railroad gin,
And like a fool I mixed them, and it strangled up my mind,
Now people just get uglier, and I got no sense of time... --Dylan

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message wsheldah 2001-06-28 12:25:06 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL
Previous Message Jan Wieck 2001-06-28 12:06:45 Re: Re: Red Hat to support PostgreSQL