Re: Postgresql vs OS compatibility matrix

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgresql vs OS compatibility matrix
Date: 2003-10-30 04:33:21
Message-ID: m3ad7jjqem.fsf@wolfe.cbbrowne.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Oops! CHEWTC(at)ap(dot)nec(dot)com(dot)sg was seen spray-painting on a wall:
> We installed our Postgresql package from the RH CDROM v9.
> The version is v7.3.2
>
> Is there a compatibility matrix for Postgresql vs OS that I can verify?
>
> I have checked the ftp sites for Postgresql software under the
> binary/RPMS folder and discovered that v7.3.2 is not available for
> redhat 9.0 Only v7.3.3 and above is available for redhat 9.0

The reason for minor releases is to fix substantial problems.

Nobody bothered packaging 7.3.2 for RH9.0 because by the time RH9.0
was available, 7.3.3 or 7.3.4 were available, and there was therefore
no point in packaging a version KNOWN TO BE DEFECTIVE when there was a
version available KNOWN TO ADDRESS THOSE DEFECTS.

Unless you specifically want to live with the defects remedied in
7.3.3 and 7.3.4, then you should upgrade to 7.3.4.

It actually appears likely, based on recent discussions, that there
will be a 7.3.5; there might be merit in going to that.
--
let name="cbbrowne" and tld="acm.org" in name ^ "@" ^ tld;;
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/lsf.html
"If you pick up a starving dog and make him prosperous, he will not
bite you; that is the principal difference between a dog and a man."
-- Mark Twain

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2003-10-30 04:37:41 Re: Duplicate user in pg_shadow
Previous Message CHEWTC 2003-10-30 04:26:43 Re: Duplicate user in pg_shadow