From: | Tim Landscheidt <tim(at)tim-landscheidt(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: where clauses and selects |
Date: | 2009-09-08 18:10:18 |
Message-ID: | m3ab151f5h.fsf@passepartout.tim-landscheidt.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
Scott Frankel <leknarf(at)pacbell(dot)net> wrote:
> Is it possible to perform a select in the where clause of a statement?
> I have a situation where I've got one arm tied behind my
> back: I can only have a single table in the select and from
> clauses, but the where clause appears to be freed from that
> restriction.
> Given a statement as follows:
> SELECT foo.foo_id, foo.name
> FROM foo, bar
> WHERE foo.bar_id = bar.bar_id
> AND bar.name = 'martini';
> I'm looking for a way to recast it so that the select and
> from clauses refer to a single table and the join
> referencing the second table occurs in the where clause.
> [...]
Something along the lines of:
| SELECT foo.foo_id, foo.name FROM foo WHERE foo.bar_id = (SELECT bar.bar_id FROM bar WHERE bar.name = 'martini');
should do the trick.
> I've explored the "where exists" clause, but it's not
> supported by the application toolkit I'm using. AFAIK, I've
> only got access to where ...
Dump it. Seriously. There are so many fine things you can do
with a full-fledged database - you certainly do not want to
be restricted in this regard.
Tim
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David Fetter | 2009-09-08 18:17:11 | Re: [sfpug] Statistics and PostgreSQL: Streaming Webcast tonight |
Previous Message | David Fetter | 2009-09-08 17:32:53 | Re: [sfpug] Statistics and PostgreSQL: Streaming Webcast tonight |