From: | "Dr(dot) Peter Voigt" <pvoigt(at)uos(dot)de> |
---|---|
To: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org> |
Cc: | "BitRock Support" <support(at)bitrock(dot)com>, pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: PostgreSQL 9.0 (x86-64) and Windows 7 (x86-64) - Unable to install |
Date: | 2010-10-01 15:15:35 |
Message-ID: | m38w2induw.fsf@uos.de |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
First of all: Thanks to all who contributed to this issue. There are
many helpful and interesting comments.
I am going to reply to Christian's first question: How did TEMP end up
with this value?
I have just scanned my installation protocol which says, that I made a
registry backup of the current user enviroment right after the basic
system installation. After that backup I restored the previously saved
Windows XP Pro x86 DE user environment. This step changed the TEMP
setting from its default value to "C:\Users\ADMINI~1\LOKALE~1\Temp"
(8.3 notation), which corresponds to
"C:\Users\Administrator\Lokale Einstellungen\Temp".
I unintentionally changed the TEMP variable from its default
setting. I should have checked whether the TEMP values has changed or
not - but I did not. Newertheless, I would not have expected any
problems from a changed TEMP setting even if it contains links.
From my backup of the original user environment
[HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Environment] I can reconstruct the default value of
TEMP:
TEMP=%USERPROFILE%\AppData\Local\Temp
which resolves to
TEMP=C:\Users\Administrator\AppData\Local\Temp
The default TEMP setting does not contain any links. As a link is
obviously causing the installer to fail, it will probably finish
without problems when using either the default TEMP setting or any
non-default setting that does not contain any links.
Before I am going to install with the default TEMP setting I am doing
the desired tests for the BitRock Support and wait for the answer.
I will keep the list informed about any new results.
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Thom Brown | 2010-10-01 15:23:07 | Re: Analyze tool? |
Previous Message | Michal Politowski | 2010-10-01 15:13:58 | Why would a scan take so long? |