| From: | Manuel Sugawara <masm(at)fciencias(dot)unam(dot)mx> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Cannot use a standalone backend to VACUUM in "postgres"" |
| Date: | 2008-04-08 19:31:42 |
| Message-ID: | m37if8ywgx.fsf@conexa.fciencias.unam.mx |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
> Manuel Sugawara wrote:
>
> Hi Manuel,
>
>> The funny thing is that there was no open transactions, even after
>> restarting the cluster the same message was logged. Today, the
>> database stopped working as expected:
>>
>> ERROR: database is shut down to avoid wraparound data loss in database "postgres"
>> HINT: Stop the postmaster and use a standalone backend to VACUUM in "postgres"
>
> I suggest you look for temp tables that have not been reclaimed. We've
> had a couple of reports where leftover temp tables have stopped the
> frozen-xid counter from advancing. (They would have a very old
> relfrozenxid.)
In each database executed:
select relname, age(relfrozenxid) from pg_class where relnamespace = '10406'::oid;
(note that 10406 is the oid of the pg_temp_1 namespace) none of them
showed temp tables, Is this the correct way?, Any other idea?.
Regards,
Manuel.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-08 19:37:57 | Re: Cannot use a standalone backend to VACUUM in "postgres"" |
| Previous Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2008-04-08 19:09:34 | Re: More SSL crash woes |