| From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)wireboard(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "D(dot) Hageman" <dhageman(at)dracken(dot)com> |
| Cc: | mlw <markw(at)mohawksoft(dot)com>, Justin Clift <justin(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Haroldo Stenger <hstenger(at)adinet(dot)com(dot)uy>, "Marc G(dot) Fournier" <scrappy(at)hub(dot)org>, <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Subject: | Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server |
| Date: | 2002-02-07 22:30:27 |
| Message-ID: | m366586i2k.fsf@varsoon.denali.to |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
"D. Hageman" <dhageman(at)dracken(dot)com> writes:
> (3) Parallelize house keeping (for example vacuums) of the database. I
> think they are going to call this processes or something slated for the
> next version?
>
> (4) Replication
>
> (5) Referential Integritity cleanups
>
> (6) EXOTIC FEATURES: crossdb
I fail to see how threads are required for any of these. They could
just as well be done with a separate process(es) in the current model.
-Doug
--
Let us cross over the river, and rest under the shade of the trees.
--T. J. Jackson, 1863
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | F Harvell | 2002-02-07 22:35:43 | Re: Replication |
| Previous Message | D. Hageman | 2002-02-07 22:10:36 | Re: Threaded PosgreSQL server |