From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
---|---|
To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: Table Partitioning in Postgres: |
Date: | 2003-02-20 03:32:18 |
Message-ID: | m365rfeif1.fsf@chvatal.cbbrowne.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general |
In an attempt to throw the authorities off his trail, greg(at)CopelandConsulting(dot)Net (Greg Copeland) transmitted:
> While I have read that many expect serial ATA to seriously challenge
> SCSI I honestly have no idea where the rhetoric stops and reality
> begins. I'd hazard a guess we'll really not know the whole truth until
> samples become widely available from multiple sources including drives,
> drivers, and host interfaces.
I'd see Serial ATA being a "serious challenger" if it allowed you to
cheaply build some "embarrassingly-parallel" RAID servers where you
were able to get 16 drives hooked up, each on its own ATA 'bus' for
about the price of 4-way SCSI.
But the intended market is doubtless the super-price-conscious market,
which naturally leads to the overall quality of the results being
pretty compromised.
--
output = ("cbbrowne" "@ntlug.org")
http://www3.sympatico.ca/cbbrowne/sgml.html
Rules of the Evil Overlord #43. "I will maintain a healthy amount of
skepticism when I capture the beautiful rebel and she claims she is
attracted to my power and good looks and will gladly betray her
companions if I just let her in on my plans."
<http://www.eviloverlord.com/>
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2003-02-20 03:37:45 | Re: 7.3.1 takes long time to vacuum table? |
Previous Message | sam | 2003-02-20 03:10:58 | VB to postgresql located in Unix. |