| From: | Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | Vincent Janelle <random(at)goblinstudios(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: DAFS? |
| Date: | 2002-10-30 21:35:59 |
| Message-ID: | m34rb3d2yo.fsf@varsoon.wireboard.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
Vincent Janelle <random(at)goblinstudios(dot)com> writes:
> On 30 Oct 2002 08:47:18 -0500
> Doug McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org> wrote:
>
> > Graeme Hinchliffe <graeme(at)vianetworks(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> >
> > > but dafs isn't nfs. we were trialing netapp for storage but are
> > > going back to local disks as the db ran VERY slowly in comparison.
> > > dafs should accelerate things from what i have read.
> >
> > If it presents a POSIX filesystem API then PG should work OK with it.
> >
> > -Doug
>
> Doesn't appear to. A quick scan of the SDK docs appears as though as if
> its a direct implementation to access the storage of a device supporting
> it by applications, such as database servers over a network.. Kinda like
> raw devices.
Well then I can safely say it won't work with PG as distributed. ;)
-Doug
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Neil Conway | 2002-10-30 21:46:11 | Re: Returning row(s) from PL/pgSQL? |
| Previous Message | Vincent Janelle | 2002-10-30 21:22:47 | Re: DAFS? |