| From: | Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: cobol storedprocedures |
| Date: | 2005-08-17 13:17:15 |
| Message-ID: | m34q9ok8is.fsf@mobile.int.cbbrowne.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
> I've been scanning the postgres website and yours to find out any
> information on cobol stored procedures. Is there any plans on
> incorporating this in future releases?
Not really.
The 'preferred' sorts of languages to include for stored procedures
tend to be interpreted languages.
There is something of a paucity of free cross-platform COBOL
implementations, and what I've heard of have been compiled, which
makes them somewhat less ideal...
The best chance might be to locate some COBOL-to-Java translator, and
look into linking the results in to one of the Java stored procedure
systems...
--
(reverse (concatenate 'string "moc.liamg" "@" "enworbbc"))
http://cbbrowne.com/info/cobol.html
If we were meant to fly, we wouldn't keep losing our luggage.
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tino Wildenhain | 2005-08-17 13:17:29 | Re: Set autocommit to off |
| Previous Message | Csaba Nagy | 2005-08-17 13:09:42 | Re: Postgresql server "crash" after some day |