Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: Jean-Paul Argudo <jean-paul(at)postgres(dot)fr>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Greg Sabino Mullane <greg(at)turnstep(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Heroku early upgrade is raising serious questions
Date: 2013-04-16 07:21:49
Message-ID: m2zjwzueia.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> writes:
> People will not be happy if we add people to packagers and someone leaks
> information to hackers before the official release.

Indeed. That's the way it works today, though.

> Again, the damage is done if someone leaks information, and being
> removed from packagers doesn't fix the security problem for everyone
> else. We just can't have an iterative process here were we guess who is
> trust-worthy and vulnerable, and then remove people when we are wrong.

Agreed. It's a problem of trust, not of procedure, and that's what I
wanted to stress in my previous email by saying that we already have the
procedure. Thanks for underlining it.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-advocacy by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2013-04-16 07:51:33 Re: 9.3 Beta 1 Coming Soon!
Previous Message Ian Lawrence Barwick 2013-04-16 00:51:44 Re: 9.3 Beta 1 Coming Soon!