| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Remove pg_am.amindexnulls? |
| Date: | 2011-01-08 12:15:52 |
| Message-ID: | m2y66vr3pj.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
> Now that GIN can index null items, its amindexnulls flag in pg_am really
> ought to be set true. However, looking at the usage of that column,
> I wonder whether we shouldn't just delete it instead. The only present
> usage is a rather convoluted test in CLUSTER to see if the index is
> safely clusterable --- and AFAICS that test has been obsoleted anyhow
> by the later addition of pg_am.amclusterable. Anyone against
> simplifying matters by getting rid of pg_am.amindexnulls?
There has been multiple attempts at implementing bitmap indexes in the
"recent" past, any impact between that efforts and your change? That's
all I can think about and I don't even know how much it's related…
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-01-08 12:17:51 | Re: We need to log aborted autovacuums |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2011-01-08 12:14:05 | Re: obj_unique_identifier(oid) |