From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Include WAL in base backup |
Date: | 2011-01-16 17:45:07 |
Message-ID: | m2wrm4d9p8.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> writes:
>> What if you start a concurrent process that begins streaming the WAL
>> segments just before you start the backup, and you stop it after having
>> stopped the backup. I would think that then, the local received files
>> would be complete. We would only need a program able to stream the WAL
>> segments and build WAL files from that… do you know about one? :)
>
> Sure, if you stream the backups "on the side", then you don't need
> this feature. This is for "very simple filesystem backups", without
> the need to set up streaming of archiving.
What I meant is: why don't we provide an option to automate just that
behavior in pg_basebackup? It looks like a fork() then calling code you
already wrote.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2011-01-16 17:49:27 | Re: patch: fix performance problems with repated decomprimation of varlena values in plpgsql |
Previous Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2011-01-16 17:45:02 | Re: textarray option for file FDW |