| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Chris Travers <chris(dot)travers(at)gmail(dot)com>, Rob Napier <rob(at)doitonce(dot)net(dot)au>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: What do do about Object-Relational label, was Help me improve the 9.2 release announcement! |
| Date: | 2012-08-15 20:51:54 |
| Message-ID: | m2wr0zg9p1.fsf@101.dhcp.adm.naquadah.org |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> writes:
>>> I think we should call Postgres a multi-model database.
> "NewSQL". ;-)
YeSQL.
More seriously, I too think that "object-relational" is not descriptive
of what PostgreSQL has to offer. Extensible relational would be more
accurate, and I like "Multi-Model" better, even when that sounds a
little like "roll your own, we don't care that much".
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine 06 63 07 10 78
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Josh Berkus | 2012-08-18 23:14:05 | EngineYard now defaulting to PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Alejandro Carrillo | 2012-08-11 17:17:03 | Re: Call for RCs for 9.2 release |