On Thu, May 6, 2010 at 3:01 PM, Joseph Adams <joeyadams3(dot)14159(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> This isn't exactly a bug, but it could be considered unintuitive
> behavior. Consider this:
by unintuitive you mean: 'explicitly defined in the SQL standard' :-).
I happen to agree with you but that's irrelevant. If you absolutely
require this use the composite type workaround.
merlin