Re: Quick Extensions Question

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Quick Extensions Question
Date: 2011-03-03 17:55:51
Message-ID: m2tyfkxf4o.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
> We've been talking about PLs, but what about the other thing David asked:
> could we have extension entries for compile-time options like SSL or libxml,
> so that you could define a dependency on them?

Then those should be marked "System" and only get displayed with \dxS,
or this will completely bloat the extension listings. Also if we get
there, what about listing all the SQL Standard Features (optional only
maybe) that are provided by the server?

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message David E. Wheeler 2011-03-03 17:56:30 Re: Quick Extensions Question
Previous Message Dimitri Fontaine 2011-03-03 17:51:11 Re: Sync Rep v19