Re: Extension Templates S03E11

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Extension Templates S03E11
Date: 2013-12-02 20:17:30
Message-ID: m2txerknxh.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> What I've been trying to point out is that there's absolutely zero need
> for the 'extension template' part of this to make a pg_restore work for
> an entirely-in-the-catalog extension. I realize that's how you've done
> it with this patch set but that doesn't make it necessary.

If it's an extension, it's filtered out of pg_dump, so it's not part of
your pg_restore. Full Stop. This point has been debated and there has
been a very clear conclusion a year ago.

What am I missing here?
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Ian Pilcher 2013-12-02 20:21:49 Re: Trust intermediate CA for client certificates
Previous Message Stephen Frost 2013-12-02 20:17:16 Re: Extension Templates S03E11