From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Cc: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Boszormenyi Zoltan <zb(at)cybertec(dot)at>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |
Date: | 2013-12-02 20:17:30 |
Message-ID: | m2txerknxh.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> What I've been trying to point out is that there's absolutely zero need
> for the 'extension template' part of this to make a pg_restore work for
> an entirely-in-the-catalog extension. I realize that's how you've done
> it with this patch set but that doesn't make it necessary.
If it's an extension, it's filtered out of pg_dump, so it's not part of
your pg_restore. Full Stop. This point has been debated and there has
been a very clear conclusion a year ago.
What am I missing here?
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Ian Pilcher | 2013-12-02 20:21:49 | Re: Trust intermediate CA for client certificates |
Previous Message | Stephen Frost | 2013-12-02 20:17:16 | Re: Extension Templates S03E11 |