Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> On 04/23/2013 07:53 PM, Timothy Garnett wrote:
>> Anyways, the question is if people think this is generally useful. If so
>> I can clean up the preferred choice a bit and rebase it off of master,
>> etc.
I find this idea very useful yes.
Another idea would be to allow for parallel pg_dump output to somehow be
piped into a parallel pg_restore. I don't know how to solve that at all,
it just sound something worthy of doing too.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support