Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndquadrant(dot)fr>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: A different approach to extension NO USER DATA feature
Date: 2011-02-07 16:23:08
Message-ID: m2r5bjzudv.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> one I'd been thinking about a bit was OIDs of modules this one depends
> on. The current design doesn't cope very well with modules that depend
> on other ones.

Or even at all. I guess here "modules" is referring to shared object
libraries, right? Or are you already thinking about extension that
depend on other extensions, like earthdistance depends on cube?

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2011-02-07 16:23:25 Re: Sync Rep for 2011CF1
Previous Message Tom Lane 2011-02-07 16:16:42 Re: Where the Quals are actually 'List'ed