| From: | Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Alex Knight" <knight(at)phunc(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Marshall Spight" <marshall(at)meetstheeye(dot)com>, <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: PL/java? |
| Date: | 2001-09-01 10:12:03 |
| Message-ID: | m2ofovgqz0.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
* "Alex Knight" <knight(at)phunc(dot)com> wrote:
|
| Even when compiled into bytecode, Java is much slower than C/C++ when
Well, compiling into bytecode is what you always do on the Java platform.
There are some native compilers as well for the Java _language_,
but these do not produce faster code than what you get with the best
of breed just in time compilers.
| bechmarked... However, Java does what I need it to. But just to clarify,
| the "myth" continues on about "slowness."
Feel free to live in the dark.
Why do you think IBM jumped on the Java wagon ? Because they needed
some cute applets on their desktops ?
http://www-1.ibm.com/servers/eserver/iseries/news/05jun2000.htm
--
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gunnar Rønning | 2001-09-01 10:14:50 | Re: PL/java? |
| Previous Message | Gunnar Rønning | 2001-09-01 09:56:16 | Re: PL/java? |