| From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
|---|---|
| To: | Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Kevin Grittner <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Itagaki Takahiro <itagaki(dot)takahiro(at)gmail(dot)com>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: leaky views, yet again |
| Date: | 2010-10-08 07:19:02 |
| Message-ID: | m2lj69due1.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Hi,
Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> Wow, I just kind of assumed you could; I'm not really sure why. Perhaps
> it'll be possible in the future though, so might be something to think
> about if/when it happens. Can't see a way to abuse the view from inside
> a DO or in a function in the same way either.
It took me some time and reviewing the patch to think about it this way,
so maybe that would help some readers here: DO is a utility command, not
a query. That also explains why it does not get parameters.
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Pavel Stehule | 2010-10-08 07:26:45 | Re: proposal: plpgsql, solution for derivated types of parameters |
| Previous Message | Dimitri Fontaine | 2010-10-08 07:13:55 | Re: Issues with Quorum Commit |