Re: Sync Rep Design

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Cc: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com>, greg(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)com, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Sync Rep Design
Date: 2011-01-04 22:24:43
Message-ID: m2lj30l32s.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Josh Berkus <josh(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> What about the HBA here?
>
> Hmmm. That's tempting; an "synchronous" HBA instead of a GUC? But that
> doesn't solve the problem of "standby #6 is failing, I want to kick it
> off synch rep".
>
> I'd be opposed to having a GUC *and* an HBA. making DBAs set things
> independantly in two places just frustrates our users.

I was just thinking that you could prepend a reject line at the right
place in the file.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2011-01-04 22:52:54 Re: can shared cache be swapped to disk?
Previous Message Josh Berkus 2011-01-04 22:18:13 Re: Sync Rep Design