Re: RE: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH]

* "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> wrote:
|
| Regarding the catch-22 with Blob, etc. I think we need to make a harsh
| decision here. Either break the existing code, or create another driver
| codebase. If we don't do something we will be doomed to non-compliance.
| This will hurt the driver in the not too distant future. There are a lot
| of tools out there which the driver needs to be compatible with.
|

I would say that it is better to break existing code that depends on
broken behaviour than being out of sync with the standard. Not following
the JDBC standard is just asking for a fork - there are a lot of
object relational tools out there and if want these to work with postgresql
we have no choice.

--
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/