Re: index on function confuses drop table cascade on child

From: Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: "Kevin Grittner" <Kevin(dot)Grittner(at)wicourts(dot)gov>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: index on function confuses drop table cascade on child
Date: 2010-11-02 13:46:27
Message-ID: m2hbfz4z4c.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-bugs

Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Any thoughts out there?

Color me slow, but I don't understand what allows an index creation on a
table to not systematically add a dependency entry for the index that
references the table.

Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support

In response to

Browse pgsql-bugs by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2010-11-02 14:29:40 Re: index on function confuses drop table cascade on child
Previous Message Tom Lane 2010-11-02 00:42:48 Re: index on function confuses drop table cascade on child