Re: weirdness with the a sql update

From: Douglas McNaught <doug(at)mcnaught(dot)org>
To: tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: weirdness with the a sql update
Date: 2005-08-04 14:41:36
Message-ID: m2fytplq73.fsf@Douglas-McNaughts-Powerbook.local
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-general

Tony Caduto <tony_caduto(at)amsoftwaredesign(dot)com> writes:

> Hi,
>
> I just noticed this, if I do a update like this:
>
> update new_requests set name = 'tony' where request_id = 2
>
> If I do a select * from new_requests that record I just updated is now
> at the bottom , before the update it was at the top?
>
> Why is Postgresql changing the ordering of the results after a simple
> update?

Results are returned in an arbitrary order unless you supply an ORDER
BY clause in your query.

> It almost looks like the record is being dropped and then readded to
> the end.

Yup. In Postgres, UPDATE == DELETE + INSERT, so the new row will very
likely go into a different place (this is so that existing
transactions can still see the old row before your transaction
commits).

-Doug

In response to

Browse pgsql-general by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Sven Willenberger 2005-08-04 14:51:12 Re: weirdness with the a sql update
Previous Message Martijn van Oosterhout 2005-08-04 14:35:28 Re: weirdness with the a sql update