From: | Dimitri Fontaine <dimitri(at)2ndQuadrant(dot)fr> |
---|---|
To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
Cc: | marc(at)bloodnok(dot)com, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org |
Subject: | Re: [GENERAL] Dropping extensions |
Date: | 2011-07-30 20:46:46 |
Message-ID: | m2fwln1op5.fsf@2ndQuadrant.fr |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Hmm. I don't think we have any code in there to prohibit the same
> object from being made a member of two different extensions ... but this
> example suggests that maybe we had better check that.
I see you did take care of that, thank you!
Regards,
--
Dimitri Fontaine
http://2ndQuadrant.fr PostgreSQL : Expertise, Formation et Support
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2011-07-30 21:58:42 | Re: Statistics about Streaming Replication deployments in production |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-30 20:45:32 | Re: ERROR: could not read block 4707 of relation 1663/16384/16564: Success |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dean Rasheed | 2011-07-30 22:40:46 | Re: cataloguing NOT NULL constraints |
Previous Message | Dave Page | 2011-07-30 19:32:03 | Re: libedit memory stomp is apparently fixed in OS X Lion |