From: | Gunnar Rønning <gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> |
Cc: | "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Rainer Mager" <rmager(at)vgkk(dot)com>, "PostgreSQL jdbc list" <pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
Date: | 2001-06-22 11:42:12 |
Message-ID: | m2bsngrbaj.fsf@smaug.polygnosis.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-admin pgsql-jdbc pgsql-patches |
* "Dave Cramer" <Dave(at)micro-automation(dot)net> wrote:
|
| my two cents worth...
|
| 1) what is the problem that this is trying to solve, I assume from the
| subject that it is some sort of high memory usage?
I would like to know as well.
| 2) I am trying to understand how a statement would ever be used by more than
| one thread at a time? I would think that it would be impossible to share
| statements across threads.
Quite easy. Just the same way as you share any other object across threads
and according to the JDBC spec requires that the driver shoudl be thread
safe.
| 3) The double locking method used is alledgedly unsafe on SMP machines
| http://www.javaworld.com/javaworld/jw-02-2001/jw-0209-double_p.html.
Yup, double checked locking is not going to guarantee that you get
properly initialized objects with the current Java spec.
--
Gunnar Rønning - gunnar(at)polygnosis(dot)com
Senior Consultant, Polygnosis AS, http://www.polygnosis.com/
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-06-22 13:19:05 | RE: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
Previous Message | Kostis Mentzelos | 2001-06-22 08:35:41 | Re: rename a table |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Dave Cramer | 2001-06-22 13:19:05 | RE: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
Previous Message | Rainer Mager | 2001-06-22 04:56:17 | RE: Re: [ADMIN] High memory usage [PATCH] |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Karel Zak | 2001-06-22 12:01:27 | Re: nocreatetable for 7.1.2 [patch] |
Previous Message | RISKO Gergely | 2001-06-22 11:13:50 | Re: nocreatetable for 7.1.2 [patch] |